'Formalism and the School of Literary Criticism'

' epitome\n creative activity\n translation of hypocrisy\n- As a enlighten of literary rebuke\n- As a supposition\nHow the achievement Came to Be\nThe leading of anatomyalism\n cant vs. Marxism\nCharacteristics of Formalism\n- base Areas of Study\n- Form and Unity\n- choice of words\n- Incongruities and Inconsistencies\nEssential Questions for a Formalist Reading\n\nIntroduction\nAll literary theories aim a task of delineate what literature is and how it should be studied. As bring out of this work, literary theorists be concerned with answer a trope of questions, among them:\n1. What are the several(prenominal) roles of the author and the reader?\n2. To what degree, if at all, should an authors feeling or the diachronic moment in which a literary work was compose be a\nrelevant covariant in the compend and exegesis of the work?\n3. What characteristics of a school text should be considered most prominent in arriving at an interpretation of its import?\n\nAs a School of Literary Criticism\nFormalism is a prepare of literary unfavorable judgment having mainly to do with structural targets of a particular text. It is the analyze of a text without taking into broadsheet any outside influence. Formalism rejects (or sometimes simply brackets, i.e., ignores for the purpose of analysis) nonions of culture or societal influence, authorship, and content, and sort of focuses on modes, genres, discourse, and forms.\n\nAs a Theory\nIn literary supposition, formalism refers to vital approaches that analyze, interpret, or appraise the inherent features of a text. These features include not only grammar and phrase structure but besides literary devices such as mensuration and tropes. The formalist approach reduces the brilliance of a texts historical, biographical, and ethnic context.\nThe difference amongst Marxism and Formalism is that the Formalists dont take with the idea that the theory of literature should be connected or should have something in common or to write near experience or value and its doesnt have to deal ... '